Clinical decision support · For licensed clinicians

Personalized medicine.
Prepared by intelligence,
Decided by clinicians.

PrecisionRx AI distills your patient's genomic, lab, medication, and wearable data into the small set of decisions that matter for today's visit. Drug-gene safety, drug-drug interactions, missed labs, cardiometabolic risk — surfaced when relevant, suppressed when not.

  • 30 seconds from chart open to actionable summary
  • Every recommendation cites CPIC / USPSTF / ADA / AHA + a versioned rule ID
  • Built for SMART-on-FHIR — launches inside Epic, Cerner, athena
  • Drug-drug + drug-allergy checks built in

From $39 / clinician / mo · SaMD-track · Concept-phase prototype

What we're building§ I

Two platforms.
One thesis: precision medicine deserves a software stack of its own.

A clinical decision support OS for licensed clinicians at the chart, and a specialist therapeutics studio for the teams designing N-of-1 and ultra-rare disease therapies. Separate products, separate users, separate regulatory posture — designed to interoperate at a small set of explicit hand-offs.

Platform 01Live

PrecisionRx AI
Clinical Intelligence OS

Decision support for licensed clinicians at the chart. Genomic, lab, medication, wearable, and EHR signals — surfaced as evidence-linked recommendations the clinician approves at every step.

  • · Per-clinician SaaS · from $39 / mo
  • · SaMD-track / CDS carveout
  • · SMART-on-FHIR · Epic / Cerner / athena
  • · Risk surface: decision-support recommendations
Platform 02In development

PrecisionRx
Therapeutics Studio

Therapy candidate design + IND-track development for ultra-rare and individually-variant disease cases. ASO, CRISPR, mRNA, AAV, and protein-replacement modalities under one specialist-team workspace, with named-specialist review at every gate.

  • · Per-program enterprise license
  • · IND-supporting · 21 CFR Part 11-aligned
  • · For specialists, regulatory, CMC, PI roles
  • · Risk surface: candidate constructs + delivery plans

Two products · Three signed integration touchpoints · Zero shared codebase

The problem§ II

Clinicians shouldn't have to be the integration layer.

Healthcare is moving toward precision medicine, but most clinicians don't have the time, workflow, or integrated software to use multi-modal patient data effectively. A single patient's IVD labs, pharmacogenomic findings, sequencing results, medication history, prior side effects, wearable trends, and symptoms live in disconnected systems — while the AMA describes documentation burden following physicians home, CPIC names workflow integration as the leading barrier to PGx adoption, and reviews of patient-generated data flag clinical validity and information overload.

7+data systems a clinician may need for one personalized review
4+modalities (genomic, lab, med, wearable) for credible context
1clinician — always the final decision-maker
What we hear§ III

Five questions clinicians ask.
Five answers built into the product.

Multi-modal patient data turned into evidence-linked therapy considerations, medication review flags, monitoring plans, and reports — clinician-reviewed at every gate.

01
I don't have time to interpret all this data.

A concise patient picture: active problems, current and prior medications, key labs, genomic findings, wearable trends, and the open therapy considerations for today's visit — surfaced in one chart instead of seven.

02
PGx reports are hard to use at the point of care.

Pharmacogenomic results connect directly to the patient's current and prior medications. Each flag shows the gene, phenotype, drug, and CPIC / PharmGKB evidence source that triggered it — not a 30-page PDF.

03
Wearable data is noisy and overwhelming.

No raw data dump. Only clinically relevant changes — sleep decline or resting heart rate increase after a medication start — framed as monitoring considerations, with wear-time confidence and stale-feed gating.

04
Labs, meds, and symptoms aren't connected.

Abnormal labs link to medication safety and disease-management context. Elevated ALT / AST triggers hepatic monitoring on relevant medications. Reduced eGFR triggers renal medication review. The connections happen automatically; the clinician approves.

05
I need reports I can actually use in a visit.

Clinician-reviewed reports summarize patient-specific factors, therapy considerations, evidence strength, monitoring needs, and patient-friendly explanations — formatted for the chart note, the patient handout, and the specialist referral.

Our response

Help clinicians practice precision medicine without adding more data burden.

Evidence-linked, audit-logged, clinician-final at every step.

What's in the box§ IV

Nine modules.
One evidence-linked engine.

Adoption can start with a single lane and expand without re-platforming. Every module routes back to the same versioned rule engine and audit-logged review surface. Six teased here — see the full nine on the Clinical OS page.

01

Patient command center

Multimodal chart that unifies meds, labs, PGx, wearables, phenotype, timeline.

02

Pharmacogenomics

CPIC- and PharmGKB-aligned phenotype calls with versioned evidence.

03

Diagnostics intelligence

Lab + IVD into FHIR-ready Observation context with LOINC and quality grading.

04

Cardiometabolic

ApoB / Lp(a) / HbA1c interpreted with statin tolerability + PGx-aware therapy review.

05

Medication tolerability monitoring

Sleep, HRV, resting HR, CGM correlated to medication initiation events to surface side effects early.

06

Clinician review

Co-sign, suppression, amendment, audit log, quality-override governance.

The loop§ V

Four phases.
Determinism first. Clinician final.

A bounded decision-support flow. Each phase is independently auditable and reversible.

  1. 01phase 01 of 04

    Unify

    Pull the data the patient already has into one FHIR-shaped chart.

  2. 02phase 02 of 04

    Interpret

    Versioned deterministic rules check phenotype against meds, labs, wearables.

  3. 03phase 03 of 04

    Surface

    The 1–3 items that matter today. Longitudinal context collapses below.

  4. 04phase 04 of 04

    Verify

    Co-sign, audit, amend. The clinician approves every action.

Pricing§ VI

Simple, per-clinician pricing.

No enterprise gating. No IT ticket required for solo and small-group onboarding. Annual or monthly billing.

Solo

$39/clinician/mo

For solo physicians, longevity practices, and concierge clinics.

  • · Up to 200 active patients
  • · PGx + DDI + allergy alerts
  • · SOAP-block insert (copy)
  • · Patient handout PDFs
  • · Email support

Group

Most popular

$79/clinician/mo

Small groups (2–25 clinicians) and cardiometabolic / psychiatry clinics.

  • · Unlimited active patients
  • · SMART-on-FHIR launch (Epic, Cerner, athena)
  • · Surescripts med history
  • · Specialty mode (PGx, cardiometabolic, longevity)
  • · Priority support + onboarding session

Health system

Custom

For 25+ clinicians, integrated delivery networks, and ACOs.

  • · Dedicated tenancy + BAA
  • · Direct lab + PGx vendor integrations
  • · Custom rule library + governance console
  • · HL7/FHIR write-back to chart
  • · SLA + named CSM

PGx kit pull-through is available as a $0 entry plan with revenue share. Ask for the partnership sheet.

Try it cold

Open a real chart.
Decide for yourself.

Jane Smith, 38F. CYP2C19 PM on sertraline. New atorvastatin + clarithromycin clash. Three things to address today, eight more in the chart for context. No demo call required.